Clinical trial

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Titration, Comparing Telmisartan vs Valsartan. Taken Orally for Eight Weeks in Patients With Stage 1 and Stage 2 Hypertension

NCT00168779

View saved research
StatusCOMPLETED
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Start date2005-09-01
PhasePHASE4

Study timeline

Study start (unknown)2005-09-01Date precision: month
Registry last updated2017-12-28
Observed by CureCurrent2026-10-07

Recorded dates are source observations, not predictions. Missing milestones are not estimated.

What this registered study describes

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Titration, Comparing Telmisartan vs Valsartan. Taken Orally for Eight Weeks in Patients With Stage 1 and Stage 2 Hypertension is a interventional study listed under registry identifier NCT00168779. Its last published status is COMPLETED. Registry status does not establish that enrollment is currently open at every study site.

The published record lists 1 condition label(s), 3 intervention label(s), and 1 sponsor/collaborator entry or entries. The structured information below allows these links to be examined individually; intervention registration is not an efficacy claim.

Source: the original ClinicalTrials.gov study record. Always check the protocol, eligibility, dates, results (when posted), and contacts at the original source.

Mapped research locations

DallasTexas, United States3BirminghamAlabama, United States3ColumbusOhio, United States3HuntsvilleAlabama, United States3Pembroke PinesFlorida, United States3ChicagoIllinois, United States2AtlantaGeorgia, United States2CincinnatiOhio, United States2Oklahoma CityOklahoma, United States2OmahaNebraska, United States2Salt Lake CityUtah, United States2WichitaKansas, United States2South BendIndiana, United States2EvansvilleIndiana, United States2Los AngelesCalifornia, United States1PhiladelphiaPennsylvania, United States1St LouisMissouri, United States1San FranciscoCalifornia, United States1San DiegoCalifornia, United States1PortlandOregon, United States1IndianapolisIndiana, United States1RochesterNew York, United States1Las VegasNevada, United States1CharlotteNorth Carolina, United States1Winston-SalemNorth Carolina, United States1New OrleansLouisiana, United States1SacramentoCalifornia, United States1MilwaukeeWisconsin, United States1LouisvilleKentucky, United States1Kansas CityMissouri, United States1Long BeachCalifornia, United States1Fort LauderdaleFlorida, United States1RaleighNorth Carolina, United States1TacomaWashington, United States1BrooklynNew York, United States1NorfolkVirginia, United States1TulsaOklahoma, United States1DecaturGeorgia, United States1HollywoodFlorida, United States1PeoriaIllinois, United States1MobileAlabama, United States1NewarkDelaware, United States1RiversideCalifornia, United States1Santa AnaCalifornia, United States1KetteringOhio, United States1EdinaMinnesota, United States1TroyMichigan, United States1Coral GablesFlorida, United States1

Clinical trial site map

Published registry research cities for this specific study. Pins represent city-level locations, not exact facility addresses. Confirm current enrollment and facility details with the study team.

48 published city locations shown (maximum 300). Some registry locations may not have coordinates or may not be published yet.

How to interpret this record

CureCurrent links normalized diseases, medicines, registry study labels, sponsors and research sites. A link is not the same as a finding of clinical effectiveness. Our research guides explain how to compare studies, decode RxNorm identities, and avoid over-interpreting site and trial counts. See the published database coverage for mapping completeness.

Registry-derived research relationships: ClinicalTrials.gov. Raw condition and intervention labels remain distinct from canonical MONDO/RxNorm entities unless separately normalized.